City Demolishing Housing at Landing

Richard Bangert &nbsp&nbsp Alameda Housing Authority’s six-unit townhouse apartment buildings, on the left and top center of photo, are in the process of demolition at a cost of approximately $2.5 million. Exact same units on the right were rehabbed and are now being rented for $4,205 to $4,265.

City Demolishing Housing at Landing

Units could have housed homeless

There is decent former Navy housing for the homeless near the Main Street Ferry Terminal just two blocks from Target, but the City of Alameda has chosen to tear it down. Meanwhile a for-profit developer has upgraded similar units that were built next door in the same year and is getting market rate rent for them.

The three- and four-bedroom apartments were constructed in 1969. Their interiors were remodeled, and new dual-pane vinyl windows installed shortly before the Coast Guard families vacated the Navy-owned site in 2005, leaving the units pretty much in move-in condition. In 2019 the Navy gave the city 13 acres of property containing 96 units of vacant housing. The sole purpose of the land conveyance was to provide housing and services for the homeless.

The city could have been housing homeless people in these units for the past decade under a special lease arrangement until the city took title of the land. The Alameda Point Collaborative and the Midway Shelter did this at Alameda Point while it was still owned by the Navy.

Now the city’s Housing Authority is in the process of tearing down these remodeled units in order to implement a 10-year plan to build higher density units that could also potentially accommodate a private developer’s market rate homes.

The rationale for not using the existing units is that people who require supportive housing do not need three or four bedrooms. It is hard to understand why strapped families would not want the added space, but families of higher means demand it.

Debbie Potter, Director of Base Reuse & Community Development, also said it would be expensive to re-meter the units for utilities — a logic that was not an obstacle for the for-profit developer next door.

The city has long paid lip service to housing the homeless, but its primary goal is to add a large quantity of housing, mostly at market rate around the city, to meet arbitrary regional housing quotas. The push is not to house the needy.

The soon-to-be-demolished units could have housed homeless people now while we plan for other units. Meanwhile, a mile away, city officials have provided a portable toilet for the homeless living in tents and cars by the side of the road, and four FEMA trailers have been provided for the homeless at Alameda Point.

Something is wrong when we decide to provide Band-Aid approaches while a larger remedy is sitting on our doorstep. Rather than re-use the units like the developer next door did, and like the Navy thought we would, our demolition waste will end up in a landfill. And many homeless individuals who could otherwise be housed immediately will be left to fend for themselves on the side of the road.

Irene Dieter posts news, views and photos about Alameda on her blog www.IonAlameda.com