Letters to the Editor
We shall defend our island,
whatever the cost may be.
We shall fight on the beaches.
We shall fight on the air base.
We shall fight in the parks, in the marshlands and soccer fields.
We shall fight the snarling traffic in the streets.
We shall never surrender.
Now that Shore Line Drive has been "graced" with bicycle lanes; does the city have enough schillings left in its coffers to install a few more benches along the area?
Shore Line Drive stretches 1.5 miles from Westline Drive to Broadway. The distance between existing benches is equal to two plus football fields. Try that walk with a bad hip, knees or whatever old age has blessed you with.
Being an Alameda resident for 60 years, a senior and disabled, how gratifying to be able to sit and also enjoy the scenic views awarded the able-bodied cyclist.
New locations near the restroom facilities should be avoided (reasons being apparent).
Let’s hear it for the "cotton heads" (seniors).
The Alameda Sun received a copy of this letter.
City Council, Mayor Spencer and taxpayers:
Alameda is facing the potential of a new period of economic pain due to efforts to rescind certain economic development projects. These attempts could cost the city hundreds of thousands in State funding and require the city to spend millions of dollars on infrastructure replacement.
In addition to the strain on the city’s budget, a decision to rescind decisions made by our City Council sends a message of instability to businesses considering expansion into Alameda. This message encourages companies to do business with other cities whose word is their bond.
Government inconsistency combined with insufficient infrastructure, like roads and utilities, limits the city’s ability to attract new businesses and new jobs. It could even result in the loss of existing businesses and the jobs
Without businesses, the burden falls directly on Alameda residents to fund budget deficits and maintain properly equipped fire and police departments. Tax increases may be the next shoe to drop.
In recent years the Island City’s economy has overcome political in-fighting and has turned budget deficits into surpluses. Plans for redevelopment of blighted buildings have moved forward to the delight of nearby residents, increased taxes on homeowners have been averted, civil services have been strengthened, and our business districts are once again providing products and services that helped Alameda to be voted one of the most desirable places to live in the United States.
Certainly, progress doesn’t come without challenges. However, countless hours of thorough planning by city staff and its community partners have skillfully crafted solutions to provide affordable housing, traffic management, infrastructure replacement and the end of blight in Alameda.
For instance, projects such as the redevelopment of the Del Monte warehouse and Alameda Point include traffic management solutions and replacing the badly deteriorated utility infrastructure at the Point. More importantly, the repeal of these projects robs the city of revenue that is paramount in keeping property and sales tax increases to a minimum.
Repeal of progressive
economic development is the not the solution to the city’s
challenges. These can only be met with action.
Delays threaten to send Alameda back into a time of political in-fighting and tarnishes the city’s reputation in the Bay Area’s greater business community. The likely result will be economic pain due to fewer jobs and higher taxes.
The progressive view of the future held by Alamedans has enabled its residents to reap the benefits of hard-fought projects like the library and the renaissance of the Alameda Theatre & Cineplex.
I urge our residents to, once again, look beyond the fear and embrace the Del Monte warehouse and Alameda Point projects.
We can all stand proudly by sending a message that "Alameda’s Word is Its Bond."