Letters to the Editor

Registered users may submit a Letter to the Editor after they first log in.

Editor:
Really? Is Castro running against opponents who do not support our kids? She writes that the more than 1,500 students being displaced due to school closures in Oakland “must now be offered to various charter school organizations.”

What an emotive word choice: “must now be offered?”

Rather than a direct endorsement of Castro, Francis builds a scaffold to pillory the 50 charter schools within Alameda County. She misuses statistics to create the impression that charter schools are bastions of racism; she points to disproportionate enrollments and suspension rates. Should suspension rates correlate with the demographics of the student population or correlate with infractions?

Using her argument, I would point out that California’s prison population hovers around 115,000 total; of these only 5% or 5,849 are female, while the remaining 95% or 109,151 prisoners are male. As a self-confessed male, I am offended, this is egregious sexism.

Francis points out that charter schools “have received a substantial level of heat” because they tend to “serve a disproportionate number of minority students” and the racial demographics of the teachers do not match those of the student population. The fact that charter schools “admit students via lottery and other randomized practices” speaks to their success and fairness, not to their failure. While Francis admits that “children and their families have a right to educational security,” she wants to eliminate school choice.

Francis argues that it is of utmost importance that Alameda County vote in support of a superintendent who is committed to holding educational institutions accountable. How do you measure accountability without metrics? Can you measure a fever without a thermometer?

Accountability has become a function of balancing and juggling demographics into a Procrustean fit. Families hope to win a lottery, pull strings, or lie about their addresses in order to get enrolled in a safe adequate school.

Why doesn’t Claudia Francis or Alysse Castro respect the right of Alameda families to make intelligent choices. If these families graduated from Alameda County public schools, should Francis and Castro doubt their ability to make smart choices or to deny them those options?

If we get rid of the adipose, remove the redundancy, the sclerotic layers and cut administrative pay, perhaps we could afford to keep all Oakland schools open, expand charter options and capacities, and end humiliating lotteries.

Francis signs off by saying that “Kids shouldn’t have to fight for their education and their futures should not be decided by lotteries.” But she wants to board up the very schools that kids are hoping to win a lottery and the privilege to attend.

If Castro does not support freedom of family choice and charter schools, how can she possibly bill herself as a candidate who “Supports Our Kids?”

— Jeffrey R. Smith, math teacher for 25 years at EHS

Editor:
Many thanks to those individuals and groups who have contributed to Midway Shelter for abused women and their children. A number of the listed donors have contributed several times during the period between April 1 and April 30.

The list of donors includes the Pipkin/McGrath family, Jordan Hagaman, Claudia Fenelon, and the Blackbaud Giving Fund.
Midway Shelter would also like to thank Lois Pryor, Camilla Whyte, Virginia Krutilek, and Bank of Marin. Lastly, I would like to thank Jane Watson, Jay Dawson, Tomorr Haximali, Annie Kersting Patti Itano, and Gaby Dolphin & Alan Pryor.

Donations may be sent to Alameda Homeless Network P.O. Box 951, Alameda, CA 94501. For further information go to www.midwayshelter.org.

— Ginny Krutilek

Alameda:
The recent news that the Supreme Court of the United States plans to overturn Roe v. Wade is simply devastating.

Millions of people across the country will now lack basic access to needed reproductive care. The consequences are dire. Women unnecessarily dying due to botched back-alley procedures, healthcare workers and women seeking care being criminalized, and the groundwork for future bans on contraception, the rights of trans and nonbinary people, and perhaps even the end of legal gay marriage.

I am beyond worried about how this will affect communities, especially those of color and from low-income backgrounds. It’ll create more inequities in a country that has seen a widening income gap for decades.

As your next Supervisor, I will do everything in my power to protect reproductive health care in Alameda County, provide more funding for reproductive health services here, and ensure that our own residents and anyone who comes to Alameda County for services are protected from any legal action that other states may try to impose.

Here in California, I am confident that we will rise to this latest challenge and stand up for reproductive rights, even as right-wing extremists continue to try to control women’s bodies.

My heart is with all of the people in states that will now become deserts for reproductive healthcare. We must all join hands and fight this wave of right-wing extremism at the ballot box this June and November and do all we can to help people across the country who will now lack access to care.

If you are able, contribute to the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL) Pro-Choice California to help protect the reproductive freedom of every person in our state.

— Lena Tam

Editor’s note: Lena Tam is a former Alameda City Councilmember who is running for the Alameda County Board of Supervisor Third District seat that was vacated after the death of Wilma Chan. The election is June 7.

Pages